Standard

The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence. / Buskens, Christianne J.; Sahami, Saloomeh; Tanis, Pieter J. et al.
In: Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2014, p. 19-27.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Harvard

Buskens, CJ, Sahami, S, Tanis, PJ & Bemelman, WA 2014, 'The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence', Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007

APA

Buskens, C. J., Sahami, S., Tanis, P. J., & Bemelman, W. A. (2014). The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence. Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 28(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007

Vancouver

Buskens CJ, Sahami S, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence. Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology. 2014;28(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007

Author

Buskens, Christianne J. ; Sahami, Saloomeh ; Tanis, Pieter J. et al. / The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence. In: Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 19-27.

BibTeX

@article{ef2b08d82e16466f806d8dcd0f9aa78f,
title = "The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence",
abstract = "Up to 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. Nowadays, a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the preferred procedure, which can be performed open or via laparoscopic approach. Since the early '90s, minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity, but the extend of restorative procedures in these patients has restricted the use of laparoscopic approaches mainly to elective procedures in specialised centres. This review discusses the benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery. It presents the current evidence on short-term and long-term post-operative results, functional outcome, fecundity, and costs, for both elective and emergency indications. In addition, the value of new techniques (including single port surgery) and alternative laparoscopic approaches (e.g. ileo-rectal anastomosis, Kock-pouch and appendectomy) will be discussed",
author = "Buskens, {Christianne J.} and Saloomeh Sahami and Tanis, {Pieter J.} and Bemelman, {Willem A.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "19--27",
journal = "Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology",
issn = "1521-6918",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence

AU - Buskens, Christianne J.

AU - Sahami, Saloomeh

AU - Tanis, Pieter J.

AU - Bemelman, Willem A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Up to 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. Nowadays, a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the preferred procedure, which can be performed open or via laparoscopic approach. Since the early '90s, minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity, but the extend of restorative procedures in these patients has restricted the use of laparoscopic approaches mainly to elective procedures in specialised centres. This review discusses the benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery. It presents the current evidence on short-term and long-term post-operative results, functional outcome, fecundity, and costs, for both elective and emergency indications. In addition, the value of new techniques (including single port surgery) and alternative laparoscopic approaches (e.g. ileo-rectal anastomosis, Kock-pouch and appendectomy) will be discussed

AB - Up to 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. Nowadays, a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the preferred procedure, which can be performed open or via laparoscopic approach. Since the early '90s, minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity, but the extend of restorative procedures in these patients has restricted the use of laparoscopic approaches mainly to elective procedures in specialised centres. This review discusses the benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery. It presents the current evidence on short-term and long-term post-operative results, functional outcome, fecundity, and costs, for both elective and emergency indications. In addition, the value of new techniques (including single port surgery) and alternative laparoscopic approaches (e.g. ileo-rectal anastomosis, Kock-pouch and appendectomy) will be discussed

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 24485252

VL - 28

SP - 19

EP - 27

JO - Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology

JF - Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology

SN - 1521-6918

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 2312097