Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. / van Es, Laurian J. M.; Sierevelt, Inger N.; Hoornenborg, Daniël et al.
In: Indian journal of orthopaedics, Vol. 56, No. 10, 10.2022, p. 1767-1773.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty
AU - van Es, Laurian J. M.
AU - Sierevelt, Inger N.
AU - Hoornenborg, Daniël
AU - van Ooij, Bas
AU - Haverkamp, Daniël
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Indian Orthopaedics Association.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Till today, Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is significantly more used than Hybrid or Uncemented Fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare Cemented, Uncemented and Hybrid Fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing TKA at Mid-term follow-up. Methods: This study was an extended data report of our prospective single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 105 patients. The primary outcome was survival at five years of follow-up calculated by Kaplan–Meier and Log-rank test. The secondary outcome was function based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Eighty-three patients were included, of which 25 belonged into group A (Cemented), 28 in group B (Uncemented), and 30 in group C (Hybrid). Mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 0.7 (range 5–7) years. The 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95%CI: 90.5; 100) in the Cemented group, 94.2% (95%CI: 86.4; 100) in the Uncemented group, and 93.8% (95%CI: 85.4; 100) in the Hybrid group for revision for any reason (p = 0.80). Functional outcome was similar among the groups. Conclusion: In our cohort of ACS Mobile Bearing TKA, there was no difference between Cemented, Uncemented, and Hybrid Fixation with regard to survival and function at Mid-term follow-up. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register (NTR3893), 2013–03-12. Level of evidence: II.
AB - Background: Till today, Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is significantly more used than Hybrid or Uncemented Fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare Cemented, Uncemented and Hybrid Fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing TKA at Mid-term follow-up. Methods: This study was an extended data report of our prospective single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 105 patients. The primary outcome was survival at five years of follow-up calculated by Kaplan–Meier and Log-rank test. The secondary outcome was function based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Eighty-three patients were included, of which 25 belonged into group A (Cemented), 28 in group B (Uncemented), and 30 in group C (Hybrid). Mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 0.7 (range 5–7) years. The 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95%CI: 90.5; 100) in the Cemented group, 94.2% (95%CI: 86.4; 100) in the Uncemented group, and 93.8% (95%CI: 85.4; 100) in the Hybrid group for revision for any reason (p = 0.80). Functional outcome was similar among the groups. Conclusion: In our cohort of ACS Mobile Bearing TKA, there was no difference between Cemented, Uncemented, and Hybrid Fixation with regard to survival and function at Mid-term follow-up. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register (NTR3893), 2013–03-12. Level of evidence: II.
KW - Bone cement
KW - Cementation
KW - Knee arthroplasty
KW - Knee prosthesis
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Total knee replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136889019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43465-022-00715-3
DO - 10.1007/s43465-022-00715-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 36187581
VL - 56
SP - 1767
EP - 1773
JO - Indian journal of orthopaedics
JF - Indian journal of orthopaedics
SN - 0019-5413
IS - 10
ER -
ID: 25933346