Standard

Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis. / van der Plaat, Laurens W.; Hoornenborg, Daniël; Sierevelt, Inger N. et al.
In: Foot and ankle surgery, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

Harvard

van der Plaat, LW, Hoornenborg, D, Sierevelt, IN, van Dijk, CN & Haverkamp, D 2021, 'Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis', Foot and ankle surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014

APA

van der Plaat, L. W., Hoornenborg, D., Sierevelt, I. N., van Dijk, C. N., & Haverkamp, D. (2021). Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis. Foot and ankle surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014

Vancouver

van der Plaat LW, Hoornenborg D, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN, Haverkamp D. Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis. Foot and ankle surgery. 2021. Epub 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014

Author

van der Plaat, Laurens W. ; Hoornenborg, Daniël ; Sierevelt, Inger N. et al. / Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis. In: Foot and ankle surgery. 2021.

BibTeX

@article{4962e58b526c4aebb5a0a446664326ca,
title = "Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criterion for hip replacements is a (projected) revision rate of less than 5% after 10 years. No such criterion is available for ankle prostheses. The objective of the current study is to compare survival rates of contemporary primary ankle prostheses to the hip-benchmark. Methods: The PRISMA methodology was used. Eligible for inclusion were clinical studies reporting revision rates of currently available primary total ankle prostheses. Data was extracted using preconstructed forms. The total and prosthesis-specific annual revision rate was calculated. Results: Fifty-seven articles of eight different ankle prostheses were included (n = 5371), totaling 513 revisions at an average 4.6 years of follow-up. An annual revision rate of 2.2 was found (i.e. an expected revision rate of 22% at 10 years). Conclusions: The expected 10-year revision rate of contemporary ankle prostheses is lower than the current benchmark for hip prostheses.",
keywords = "Ankle prosthesis, Meta-analysis, Survival",
author = "{van der Plaat}, {Laurens W.} and Dani{\"e}l Hoornenborg and Sierevelt, {Inger N.} and {van Dijk}, {C. Niek} and Dani{\"e}l Haverkamp",
note = "Funding Information: Dr. Haverkamp reports grants and personal fees from Mathys, grants from Implantcast, grants from Alphamed, grants and personal fees from Arthrex, grants and personal fees from Kiomed, from null, outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 European Foot and Ankle Society",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014",
language = "English",
journal = "Foot and ankle surgery",
issn = "1460-9584",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ten-year revision rates of contemporary total ankle arthroplasties equal 22%. A meta-analysis

AU - van der Plaat, Laurens W.

AU - Hoornenborg, Daniël

AU - Sierevelt, Inger N.

AU - van Dijk, C. Niek

AU - Haverkamp, Daniël

N1 - Funding Information: Dr. Haverkamp reports grants and personal fees from Mathys, grants from Implantcast, grants from Alphamed, grants and personal fees from Arthrex, grants and personal fees from Kiomed, from null, outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 European Foot and Ankle Society

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criterion for hip replacements is a (projected) revision rate of less than 5% after 10 years. No such criterion is available for ankle prostheses. The objective of the current study is to compare survival rates of contemporary primary ankle prostheses to the hip-benchmark. Methods: The PRISMA methodology was used. Eligible for inclusion were clinical studies reporting revision rates of currently available primary total ankle prostheses. Data was extracted using preconstructed forms. The total and prosthesis-specific annual revision rate was calculated. Results: Fifty-seven articles of eight different ankle prostheses were included (n = 5371), totaling 513 revisions at an average 4.6 years of follow-up. An annual revision rate of 2.2 was found (i.e. an expected revision rate of 22% at 10 years). Conclusions: The expected 10-year revision rate of contemporary ankle prostheses is lower than the current benchmark for hip prostheses.

AB - Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criterion for hip replacements is a (projected) revision rate of less than 5% after 10 years. No such criterion is available for ankle prostheses. The objective of the current study is to compare survival rates of contemporary primary ankle prostheses to the hip-benchmark. Methods: The PRISMA methodology was used. Eligible for inclusion were clinical studies reporting revision rates of currently available primary total ankle prostheses. Data was extracted using preconstructed forms. The total and prosthesis-specific annual revision rate was calculated. Results: Fifty-seven articles of eight different ankle prostheses were included (n = 5371), totaling 513 revisions at an average 4.6 years of follow-up. An annual revision rate of 2.2 was found (i.e. an expected revision rate of 22% at 10 years). Conclusions: The expected 10-year revision rate of contemporary ankle prostheses is lower than the current benchmark for hip prostheses.

KW - Ankle prosthesis

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107678486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014

M3 - Review article

C2 - 34116950

JO - Foot and ankle surgery

JF - Foot and ankle surgery

SN - 1460-9584

ER -

ID: 18665202