Standard

Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). / On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group.

In: Gynecologic oncology, Vol. 162, No. 2, 08.2021, p. 331-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Harvard

On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group 2021, 'Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA)', Gynecologic oncology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030

APA

On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group (2021). Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). Gynecologic oncology, 162(2), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030

Vancouver

On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group. Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). Gynecologic oncology. 2021 Aug;162(2):331-338. Epub 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030

Author

On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group. / Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). In: Gynecologic oncology. 2021 ; Vol. 162, No. 2. pp. 331-338.

BibTeX

@article{e341f81309e54bfba33c981e4092e1fa,
title = "Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA)",
abstract = "Objectives: The challenge when performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is to balance the benefits and risks. The aim of this study was to report short term postoperative morbidity and mortality in relation to surgical outcome in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking (IDS) surgery in the Netherlands. Methods: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA) was used for retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing PDS or IDS between January 1st, 2015 - December 31st, 2018 were included. Outcome was frequency of postoperative complications. Median time to adjuvant chemotherapy and severity of complications were related to outcome of CRS. Complications with Clavien-Dindo ≥3 were analyzed per region and case mix corrected. Statistical analysis was performed with R.Studio. Results: 1027 patients with PDS and 1355 patients with IDS were included. Complications with re-invention were significantly higher in PDS compared to IDS (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.048). Complete cytoreduction was 69.7% in PDS and 62.1% IDS, p < 0.001. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy was 49 days in patients with complete CRS and a complication with re-intervention. Regional variation for severe complications showed one region outside confidence intervals. Conclusions: Higher complete cytoreduction rate in the PDS group indicates that the correct patients have been selected, but is associated with a higher percentage of complication with re-intervention. As result, time to start adjuvant chemotherapy is longer in this group. Maintaining a balance in aggressiveness of surgery and outcome of the surgical procedure with respect to severe complications is underlined. Bench marked data should be discussed nationally to improve this balance.",
keywords = "Complications, Cytroreductive surgery, Postoperative outcomes, Time to adjuvant chemotherapy",
author = "{Baldewpersad Tewarie}, {N. M. S.} and {van Driel}, {W. J.} and {van Ham}, M. and Wouters, {M. W.} and R. Kruitwagen and Kruse, {A. J.} and R. Yigit and {van der Aa}, M. and Mens, {J. W.} and Stam, {T. C.} and J. Diepstraten and {van der Kolk}, A. and H. Verhoeve and Smedts, {H. P. M.} and {van Haaften-de Jong}, {A. M. L. D.} and N. Reesink and Vos, {M. C.} and {ten Cate}, {A. D.} and Slangen, {B. F. M.} and Timmers, {P. J.} and Smit, {R. A.} and Gaarenstroom, {K. N.} and Vencken, {P. M. L. H.} and Engelen, {M. J. A.} and Verbruggen, {M. B.} and D. Boll and J. Briet and G. Fons and Coppus, {S. F. P. J.} and A. Baalbergen and {van Dorst}, {E. B. L.} and Tjiong, {M. Y.} and Roes, {E. M.} and Visschers, {B. A. J. T.} and Gerestein, {C. G.} and Nagel, {H. T. C.} and Aalders, {A. L.} and L. Hofman and J. Lange and I. Ebisch and {de Waard}, J. and {van der Plas-Koning}, {Y. W. C. M.} and {On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group} and M. Huisman",
note = "Funding Information: None. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "331--338",
journal = "Gynecologic oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative outcomes of primary and interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer registered in the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA)

AU - Baldewpersad Tewarie, N. M. S.

AU - van Driel, W. J.

AU - van Ham, M.

AU - Wouters, M. W.

AU - Kruitwagen, R.

AU - Kruse, A. J.

AU - Yigit, R.

AU - van der Aa, M.

AU - Mens, J. W.

AU - Stam, T. C.

AU - Diepstraten, J.

AU - van der Kolk, A.

AU - Verhoeve, H.

AU - Smedts, H. P. M.

AU - van Haaften-de Jong, A. M. L. D.

AU - Reesink, N.

AU - Vos, M. C.

AU - ten Cate, A. D.

AU - Slangen, B. F. M.

AU - Timmers, P. J.

AU - Smit, R. A.

AU - Gaarenstroom, K. N.

AU - Vencken, P. M. L. H.

AU - Engelen, M. J. A.

AU - Verbruggen, M. B.

AU - Boll, D.

AU - Briet, J.

AU - Fons, G.

AU - Coppus, S. F. P. J.

AU - Baalbergen, A.

AU - van Dorst, E. B. L.

AU - Tjiong, M. Y.

AU - Roes, E. M.

AU - Visschers, B. A. J. T.

AU - Gerestein, C. G.

AU - Nagel, H. T. C.

AU - Aalders, A. L.

AU - Hofman, L.

AU - Lange, J.

AU - Ebisch, I.

AU - de Waard, J.

AU - van der Plas-Koning, Y. W. C. M.

AU - On behalf of the participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group

AU - Huisman, M.

N1 - Funding Information: None. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - Objectives: The challenge when performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is to balance the benefits and risks. The aim of this study was to report short term postoperative morbidity and mortality in relation to surgical outcome in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking (IDS) surgery in the Netherlands. Methods: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA) was used for retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing PDS or IDS between January 1st, 2015 - December 31st, 2018 were included. Outcome was frequency of postoperative complications. Median time to adjuvant chemotherapy and severity of complications were related to outcome of CRS. Complications with Clavien-Dindo ≥3 were analyzed per region and case mix corrected. Statistical analysis was performed with R.Studio. Results: 1027 patients with PDS and 1355 patients with IDS were included. Complications with re-invention were significantly higher in PDS compared to IDS (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.048). Complete cytoreduction was 69.7% in PDS and 62.1% IDS, p < 0.001. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy was 49 days in patients with complete CRS and a complication with re-intervention. Regional variation for severe complications showed one region outside confidence intervals. Conclusions: Higher complete cytoreduction rate in the PDS group indicates that the correct patients have been selected, but is associated with a higher percentage of complication with re-intervention. As result, time to start adjuvant chemotherapy is longer in this group. Maintaining a balance in aggressiveness of surgery and outcome of the surgical procedure with respect to severe complications is underlined. Bench marked data should be discussed nationally to improve this balance.

AB - Objectives: The challenge when performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is to balance the benefits and risks. The aim of this study was to report short term postoperative morbidity and mortality in relation to surgical outcome in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking (IDS) surgery in the Netherlands. Methods: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA) was used for retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing PDS or IDS between January 1st, 2015 - December 31st, 2018 were included. Outcome was frequency of postoperative complications. Median time to adjuvant chemotherapy and severity of complications were related to outcome of CRS. Complications with Clavien-Dindo ≥3 were analyzed per region and case mix corrected. Statistical analysis was performed with R.Studio. Results: 1027 patients with PDS and 1355 patients with IDS were included. Complications with re-invention were significantly higher in PDS compared to IDS (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.048). Complete cytoreduction was 69.7% in PDS and 62.1% IDS, p < 0.001. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy was 49 days in patients with complete CRS and a complication with re-intervention. Regional variation for severe complications showed one region outside confidence intervals. Conclusions: Higher complete cytoreduction rate in the PDS group indicates that the correct patients have been selected, but is associated with a higher percentage of complication with re-intervention. As result, time to start adjuvant chemotherapy is longer in this group. Maintaining a balance in aggressiveness of surgery and outcome of the surgical procedure with respect to severe complications is underlined. Bench marked data should be discussed nationally to improve this balance.

KW - Complications

KW - Cytroreductive surgery

KW - Postoperative outcomes

KW - Time to adjuvant chemotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108605354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 34147284

VL - 162

SP - 331

EP - 338

JO - Gynecologic oncology

JF - Gynecologic oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 18845578