Standard

Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. / Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group.

In: European journal of surgical oncology, Vol. 47, No. 8, 08.2021, p. 1961-1968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. European journal of surgical oncology. 2021 Aug;47(8):1961-1968. Epub 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.005

Author

Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group. / Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. In: European journal of surgical oncology. 2021 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 1961-1968.

BibTeX

@article{dcaa1425c49b4316add82fc1f4fb9f40,
title = "Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit",
abstract = "Introduction: The value of routine intensive care unit (ICU) admission after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been questioned. This study aimed to investigate Dutch hospital variation regarding length of direct postoperative ICU stay, and the impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes. Materials and methods: Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) undergoing curative MIE were included. Length of direct postoperative ICU stay was dichotomized around the national median into short ICU stay ( ≤ 1 day) and long ICU stay ( > 1 day). A case-mix corrected funnel plot based on multivariable logistic regression analyses investigated hospital variation. The impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes was investigated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 2110 patients from 16 hospitals were included. Median length of postoperative ICU stay was 1 day [hospital variation: 0–4]. The percentage of short ICU stay ranged from 0 to 91% among hospitals. Corrected for case-mix, 7 hospitals had statistically significantly higher short ICU stay rates and 6 hospitals had lower rates. ICU readmission, in-hospital/30-day mortality, failure to rescue, postoperative pneumonia, cardiac complications and anastomotic leakage were not associated with hospital variation in length of ICU stay. Total length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in hospitals with relatively short ICU stay. Conclusion: This study showed significant hospital variation in postoperative length of ICU stay after MIE. Short ICU stay was associated with shorter overall hospital admission and did not negatively impact short-term surgical outcomes. More selected use of ICU resources could result in a national significant cost reduction.",
keywords = "Esophageal carcinoma, Failure to rescue, Hospital variation, Intensive care unit, Length of ICU stay, Short-term mortality",
author = "Voeten, {Daan M.} and {van der Werf}, {Leonie R.} and Gisbertz, {Suzanne S.} and Ruurda, {Jelle P.} and {van Berge Henegouwen}, {Mark I.} and {van Hillegersberg}, Richard and {van Det}, {Marc J.} and {van Duijvendijk}, Peter and {van Esser}, Stijn and {van Etten}, Boudewijn and {van der Harst}, Erwin and Hartgrink, {Henk H.} and Joos Heisterkamp and Nieuwenhuijzen, {Grard A. P.} and {van der Peet}, {Donald L.} and Pierie, {Jean-Pierre E. N.} and Camiel Rosman and {van Sandick}, {Johanna W.} and Sosef, {Meindert N.} and {Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group} and Wijnhoven, {Bas P. L.}",
note = "Funding Information: MIvBH is consultant for Mylan, Johnson & Johnson, Alesi Surgical and Medtronic, and received research grants from Olympus and Stryker. RvH and JPR are consultants for Medtronic and are proctoring surgeons for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and train other surgeons in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. For the remaining authors no conflicts of interest were declared. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s)",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1961--1968",
journal = "European journal of surgical oncology",
issn = "0748-7983",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit

AU - Voeten, Daan M.

AU - van der Werf, Leonie R.

AU - Gisbertz, Suzanne S.

AU - Ruurda, Jelle P.

AU - van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.

AU - van Hillegersberg, Richard

AU - van Det, Marc J.

AU - van Duijvendijk, Peter

AU - van Esser, Stijn

AU - van Etten, Boudewijn

AU - van der Harst, Erwin

AU - Hartgrink, Henk H.

AU - Heisterkamp, Joos

AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.

AU - van der Peet, Donald L.

AU - Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.

AU - Rosman, Camiel

AU - van Sandick, Johanna W.

AU - Sosef, Meindert N.

AU - Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group

AU - Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.

N1 - Funding Information: MIvBH is consultant for Mylan, Johnson & Johnson, Alesi Surgical and Medtronic, and received research grants from Olympus and Stryker. RvH and JPR are consultants for Medtronic and are proctoring surgeons for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and train other surgeons in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. For the remaining authors no conflicts of interest were declared. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - Introduction: The value of routine intensive care unit (ICU) admission after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been questioned. This study aimed to investigate Dutch hospital variation regarding length of direct postoperative ICU stay, and the impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes. Materials and methods: Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) undergoing curative MIE were included. Length of direct postoperative ICU stay was dichotomized around the national median into short ICU stay ( ≤ 1 day) and long ICU stay ( > 1 day). A case-mix corrected funnel plot based on multivariable logistic regression analyses investigated hospital variation. The impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes was investigated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 2110 patients from 16 hospitals were included. Median length of postoperative ICU stay was 1 day [hospital variation: 0–4]. The percentage of short ICU stay ranged from 0 to 91% among hospitals. Corrected for case-mix, 7 hospitals had statistically significantly higher short ICU stay rates and 6 hospitals had lower rates. ICU readmission, in-hospital/30-day mortality, failure to rescue, postoperative pneumonia, cardiac complications and anastomotic leakage were not associated with hospital variation in length of ICU stay. Total length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in hospitals with relatively short ICU stay. Conclusion: This study showed significant hospital variation in postoperative length of ICU stay after MIE. Short ICU stay was associated with shorter overall hospital admission and did not negatively impact short-term surgical outcomes. More selected use of ICU resources could result in a national significant cost reduction.

AB - Introduction: The value of routine intensive care unit (ICU) admission after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been questioned. This study aimed to investigate Dutch hospital variation regarding length of direct postoperative ICU stay, and the impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes. Materials and methods: Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) undergoing curative MIE were included. Length of direct postoperative ICU stay was dichotomized around the national median into short ICU stay ( ≤ 1 day) and long ICU stay ( > 1 day). A case-mix corrected funnel plot based on multivariable logistic regression analyses investigated hospital variation. The impact of this hospital variation on short-term surgical outcomes was investigated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 2110 patients from 16 hospitals were included. Median length of postoperative ICU stay was 1 day [hospital variation: 0–4]. The percentage of short ICU stay ranged from 0 to 91% among hospitals. Corrected for case-mix, 7 hospitals had statistically significantly higher short ICU stay rates and 6 hospitals had lower rates. ICU readmission, in-hospital/30-day mortality, failure to rescue, postoperative pneumonia, cardiac complications and anastomotic leakage were not associated with hospital variation in length of ICU stay. Total length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in hospitals with relatively short ICU stay. Conclusion: This study showed significant hospital variation in postoperative length of ICU stay after MIE. Short ICU stay was associated with shorter overall hospital admission and did not negatively impact short-term surgical outcomes. More selected use of ICU resources could result in a national significant cost reduction.

KW - Esophageal carcinoma

KW - Failure to rescue

KW - Hospital variation

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Length of ICU stay

KW - Short-term mortality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099609401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 33485673

VL - 47

SP - 1961

EP - 1968

JO - European journal of surgical oncology

JF - European journal of surgical oncology

SN - 0748-7983

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 15493672