Standard

Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. / Mellema, Jos J.; Doornberg, Job N.; Molenaars, Rik J. et al.

In: Injury, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2016, p. 944-949.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Molenaars RJ, Ring D, Kloen P, AUTHOR GROUP. Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2016;47(4):944-949. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.022

Author

BibTeX

@article{1b8a977f02b94c38800867a83824150b,
title = "Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures",
abstract = "Tibial plateau fracture classification systems have limited interobserver reliability and new systems emerge. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of the Luo classification and the Schatzker classification for two-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) and to study the effect of adding three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). Eighty-one observers, orthopedic surgeons and residents, were randomized to either 2DCT or 2D- and 3DCT evaluation of a spectrum of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures using web-based platforms in order to classify according to the Schatzker and according to Luo's Three Column classification. Reliability was calculated with the use of Siegel and Castellan's multirater kappa measure. Kappa values were interpreted according to the categorical rating by Landis and Koch. Overall interobserver reliability of the Schatzker classification was significantly better compared to the Luo classification (kSchatzker=0.32 and kLuo=0.28, P=0.021), however, 'fair' for both fracture classification systems. For the Schatzker classification observers agreed significantly better on 2DCT compared to 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.37 and k2D+3DCT=0.29, P <0.001). The addition of 3DCT did not improve the overall interobserver reliability for the Luo classification as well, as kappa values were not significantly different on 2DCT and 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.31 and k2D+3DCT=0.25, P=0.096). The agreement between observers was significantly better for the Schatzker classification compared to Luo's Three Column classification, however agreement was fair for both classification systems. Furthermore, the addition of 3DCT reconstructions did not improve the reliability of CT-based evaluation of tibial plateau fractures. Considering that new classification systems and 3DCT do not seem to improve agreement between surgeons, other efforts are needed that lead to more reliable diagnosis of complex tibial plateau fractures",
author = "Mellema, {Jos J.} and Doornberg, {Job N.} and Molenaars, {Rik J.} and David Ring and Peter Kloen and {AUTHOR GROUP} and Babis, {George C.} and Jeray, {Kyle J.} and Prayson, {Michael J.} and Rodrigo Pesantez and Ramos Acacio and Verbeek, {Diederik O.} and Parag Melvanki and Kreis, {Barbara E.} and Samir Mehta and S. Meylaerts and S. Wojtek and Yeap, {Ewe J.} and Heidi Haapasalo and An&#382;e Kristan and Chad Coles and Marsh, {J. Lawrence} and Matthew Mormino and Matthew Menon and Minos Tyllianakis and Peter Schandelmaier and Jenkinson, {R. J.} and Valentin Neuhaus and Shahriar, {Chegini M. H.} and Belangero, {William D.} and Kannan, {S. G.} and Leonidovich, {Golovakha M.} and Davenport, {J. H.} and Koroush Kabir and Althausen, {Peter L.} and Yoram Weil and Alar Toom and {Sa da Costa}, Daniel and F. Lijoi and Koukoulias, {Nikolaos E.} and Nikolaos Manidakis and {van den Bogaert}, Max and Bal&#225;zs Patczai and Anthony Grauls and Harish Kurup and {van den Bekerom}, {Michel P.} and Lansdaal, {Joris R.} and M.&#225;rio Vale and Paul Ousema and Daniel Haverkamp and T. Schepers",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.022",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "944--949",
journal = "Injury",
issn = "0020-1383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures

AU - Mellema, Jos J.

AU - Doornberg, Job N.

AU - Molenaars, Rik J.

AU - Ring, David

AU - Kloen, Peter

AU - AUTHOR GROUP

AU - Babis, George C.

AU - Jeray, Kyle J.

AU - Prayson, Michael J.

AU - Pesantez, Rodrigo

AU - Acacio, Ramos

AU - Verbeek, Diederik O.

AU - Melvanki, Parag

AU - Kreis, Barbara E.

AU - Mehta, Samir

AU - Meylaerts, S.

AU - Wojtek, S.

AU - Yeap, Ewe J.

AU - Haapasalo, Heidi

AU - Kristan, An&#382;e

AU - Coles, Chad

AU - Marsh, J. Lawrence

AU - Mormino, Matthew

AU - Menon, Matthew

AU - Tyllianakis, Minos

AU - Schandelmaier, Peter

AU - Jenkinson, R. J.

AU - Neuhaus, Valentin

AU - Shahriar, Chegini M. H.

AU - Belangero, William D.

AU - Kannan, S. G.

AU - Leonidovich, Golovakha M.

AU - Davenport, J. H.

AU - Kabir, Koroush

AU - Althausen, Peter L.

AU - Weil, Yoram

AU - Toom, Alar

AU - Sa da Costa, Daniel

AU - Lijoi, F.

AU - Koukoulias, Nikolaos E.

AU - Manidakis, Nikolaos

AU - van den Bogaert, Max

AU - Patczai, Bal&#225;zs

AU - Grauls, Anthony

AU - Kurup, Harish

AU - van den Bekerom, Michel P.

AU - Lansdaal, Joris R.

AU - Vale, M.&#225;rio

AU - Ousema, Paul

AU - Haverkamp, Daniel

AU - Schepers, T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Tibial plateau fracture classification systems have limited interobserver reliability and new systems emerge. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of the Luo classification and the Schatzker classification for two-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) and to study the effect of adding three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). Eighty-one observers, orthopedic surgeons and residents, were randomized to either 2DCT or 2D- and 3DCT evaluation of a spectrum of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures using web-based platforms in order to classify according to the Schatzker and according to Luo's Three Column classification. Reliability was calculated with the use of Siegel and Castellan's multirater kappa measure. Kappa values were interpreted according to the categorical rating by Landis and Koch. Overall interobserver reliability of the Schatzker classification was significantly better compared to the Luo classification (kSchatzker=0.32 and kLuo=0.28, P=0.021), however, 'fair' for both fracture classification systems. For the Schatzker classification observers agreed significantly better on 2DCT compared to 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.37 and k2D+3DCT=0.29, P <0.001). The addition of 3DCT did not improve the overall interobserver reliability for the Luo classification as well, as kappa values were not significantly different on 2DCT and 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.31 and k2D+3DCT=0.25, P=0.096). The agreement between observers was significantly better for the Schatzker classification compared to Luo's Three Column classification, however agreement was fair for both classification systems. Furthermore, the addition of 3DCT reconstructions did not improve the reliability of CT-based evaluation of tibial plateau fractures. Considering that new classification systems and 3DCT do not seem to improve agreement between surgeons, other efforts are needed that lead to more reliable diagnosis of complex tibial plateau fractures

AB - Tibial plateau fracture classification systems have limited interobserver reliability and new systems emerge. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of the Luo classification and the Schatzker classification for two-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) and to study the effect of adding three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). Eighty-one observers, orthopedic surgeons and residents, were randomized to either 2DCT or 2D- and 3DCT evaluation of a spectrum of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures using web-based platforms in order to classify according to the Schatzker and according to Luo's Three Column classification. Reliability was calculated with the use of Siegel and Castellan's multirater kappa measure. Kappa values were interpreted according to the categorical rating by Landis and Koch. Overall interobserver reliability of the Schatzker classification was significantly better compared to the Luo classification (kSchatzker=0.32 and kLuo=0.28, P=0.021), however, 'fair' for both fracture classification systems. For the Schatzker classification observers agreed significantly better on 2DCT compared to 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.37 and k2D+3DCT=0.29, P <0.001). The addition of 3DCT did not improve the overall interobserver reliability for the Luo classification as well, as kappa values were not significantly different on 2DCT and 2D- and 3DCT (k2DCT=0.31 and k2D+3DCT=0.25, P=0.096). The agreement between observers was significantly better for the Schatzker classification compared to Luo's Three Column classification, however agreement was fair for both classification systems. Furthermore, the addition of 3DCT reconstructions did not improve the reliability of CT-based evaluation of tibial plateau fractures. Considering that new classification systems and 3DCT do not seem to improve agreement between surgeons, other efforts are needed that lead to more reliable diagnosis of complex tibial plateau fractures

U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.022

DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 26777468

VL - 47

SP - 944

EP - 949

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

SN - 0020-1383

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 2815719