Standard

Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist. / van Eck, Carola F.; Gravare-Silbernagel, Karin; Samuelsson, Kristian et al.

In: Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, Vol. 95A, No. 20, 2013, p. 1902-e1539.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

Harvard

van Eck, CF, Gravare-Silbernagel, K, Samuelsson, K, Musahl, V, van Dijk, CN, Karlsson, J, Irrgang, JJ & Fu, FH 2013, 'Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist', Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 95A, no. 20, pp. 1902-e1539. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01437

APA

van Eck, C. F., Gravare-Silbernagel, K., Samuelsson, K., Musahl, V., van Dijk, C. N., Karlsson, J., Irrgang, J. J., & Fu, F. H. (2013). Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 95A(20), 1902-e1539. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01437

Vancouver

van Eck CF, Gravare-Silbernagel K, Samuelsson K, Musahl V, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J et al. Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2013;95A(20):1902-e1539. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01437

Author

van Eck, Carola F. ; Gravare-Silbernagel, Karin ; Samuelsson, Kristian et al. / Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist. In: Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2013 ; Vol. 95A, No. 20. pp. 1902-e1539.

BibTeX

@article{310ba33a97c345249b61cb55380bb34d,
title = "Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist",
abstract = "Published papers on anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often lack details in the description of the surgical procedure, and there are large variations in anatomic ACL reconstruction techniques. We aimed to develop a validated checklist to be used for anatomic ACL reconstruction. First, a list of all potential items that could be used in the checklist was generated. Thirty-four ACL experts were selected to participate in an anonymous online survey to rate the importance of these items on a scale of 1 to 4 (with a score of 4 having the most importance). The results were verified by surveying a large sample of 959 orthopaedic specialists who are peer reviewers for four major orthopaedic journals. Items were included in the final checklist if they received an importance score of 3 or 4 from at least 75% of the survey takers. The survey response rate was 79% (twenty-seven of thirty-four) of the ACL experts and 40% (379 of 959) of the peer reviewers. The final Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist includes seventeen items with a maximum score of 19 points. The final checklist underwent preliminary testing for internal consistency, intertester reliability, and validity. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.82, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intertester reliability was 0.65. This large survey-based study on anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in the development of the Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist; preliminary evidence for interpretation of the scores is provided",
author = "{van Eck}, {Carola F.} and Karin Gravare-Silbernagel and Kristian Samuelsson and Volker Musahl and {van Dijk}, {C. Niek} and Jon Karlsson and Irrgang, {James J.} and Fu, {Freddie H.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.L.01437",
language = "English",
volume = "95A",
pages = "1902--e1539",
journal = "Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "20",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence to Support the Interpretation and Use of the Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist

AU - van Eck, Carola F.

AU - Gravare-Silbernagel, Karin

AU - Samuelsson, Kristian

AU - Musahl, Volker

AU - van Dijk, C. Niek

AU - Karlsson, Jon

AU - Irrgang, James J.

AU - Fu, Freddie H.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Published papers on anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often lack details in the description of the surgical procedure, and there are large variations in anatomic ACL reconstruction techniques. We aimed to develop a validated checklist to be used for anatomic ACL reconstruction. First, a list of all potential items that could be used in the checklist was generated. Thirty-four ACL experts were selected to participate in an anonymous online survey to rate the importance of these items on a scale of 1 to 4 (with a score of 4 having the most importance). The results were verified by surveying a large sample of 959 orthopaedic specialists who are peer reviewers for four major orthopaedic journals. Items were included in the final checklist if they received an importance score of 3 or 4 from at least 75% of the survey takers. The survey response rate was 79% (twenty-seven of thirty-four) of the ACL experts and 40% (379 of 959) of the peer reviewers. The final Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist includes seventeen items with a maximum score of 19 points. The final checklist underwent preliminary testing for internal consistency, intertester reliability, and validity. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.82, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intertester reliability was 0.65. This large survey-based study on anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in the development of the Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist; preliminary evidence for interpretation of the scores is provided

AB - Published papers on anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often lack details in the description of the surgical procedure, and there are large variations in anatomic ACL reconstruction techniques. We aimed to develop a validated checklist to be used for anatomic ACL reconstruction. First, a list of all potential items that could be used in the checklist was generated. Thirty-four ACL experts were selected to participate in an anonymous online survey to rate the importance of these items on a scale of 1 to 4 (with a score of 4 having the most importance). The results were verified by surveying a large sample of 959 orthopaedic specialists who are peer reviewers for four major orthopaedic journals. Items were included in the final checklist if they received an importance score of 3 or 4 from at least 75% of the survey takers. The survey response rate was 79% (twenty-seven of thirty-four) of the ACL experts and 40% (379 of 959) of the peer reviewers. The final Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist includes seventeen items with a maximum score of 19 points. The final checklist underwent preliminary testing for internal consistency, intertester reliability, and validity. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.82, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intertester reliability was 0.65. This large survey-based study on anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in the development of the Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Checklist; preliminary evidence for interpretation of the scores is provided

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.L.01437

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.L.01437

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 24132368

VL - 95A

SP - 1902-e1539

JO - Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

JF - Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 20

ER -

ID: 2227868