Standard

Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review. / de Vet, Renée; van Luijtelaar, Maurice J. A.; Brilleslijper-Kater, Sonja N. et al.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 103, No. 10, 2013, p. E13-E26.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

Harvard

de Vet, R, van Luijtelaar, MJA, Brilleslijper-Kater, SN, Vanderplasschen, W, Beijersbergen, MD & Wolf, JRLM 2013, 'Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review', American journal of public health, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. E13-E26. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491

APA

de Vet, R., van Luijtelaar, M. J. A., Brilleslijper-Kater, S. N., Vanderplasschen, W., Beijersbergen, M. D., & Wolf, J. R. L. M. (2013). Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review. American journal of public health, 103(10), E13-E26. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491

Vancouver

de Vet R, van Luijtelaar MJA, Brilleslijper-Kater SN, Vanderplasschen W, Beijersbergen MD, Wolf JRLM. Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review. American journal of public health. 2013;103(10):E13-E26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491

Author

de Vet, Renée ; van Luijtelaar, Maurice J. A. ; Brilleslijper-Kater, Sonja N. et al. / Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review. In: American journal of public health. 2013 ; Vol. 103, No. 10. pp. E13-E26.

BibTeX

@article{2c1529e7123b47ae9a40f9756d0337ba,
title = "Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "We reviewed the literature on standard case management (SCM), intensive case management (ICM), assertive community treatment (ACT), and critical time intervention (CTI) for homeless adults. We searched databases for peer-reviewed English articles published from 1985 to 2011 and found 21 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies comparing case management to other services. We found little evidence for the effectiveness of ICM. SCM improved housing stability, reduced substance use, and removed employment barriers for substance users. ACT improved housing stability and was cost-effective for mentally ill and dually diagnosed persons. CTI showed promise for housing, psychopathology, and substance use and was cost-effective for mentally ill persons. More research is needed on how case management can most effectively support rapid-rehousing approaches to homelessness",
author = "{de Vet}, Ren{\'e}e and {van Luijtelaar}, {Maurice J. A.} and Brilleslijper-Kater, {Sonja N.} and Wouter Vanderplasschen and Beijersbergen, {Mari{\"e}lle D.} and Wolf, {Judith R. L. M.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "E13--E26",
journal = "American journal of public health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Case Management for Homeless Persons: A Systematic Review

AU - de Vet, Renée

AU - van Luijtelaar, Maurice J. A.

AU - Brilleslijper-Kater, Sonja N.

AU - Vanderplasschen, Wouter

AU - Beijersbergen, Mariëlle D.

AU - Wolf, Judith R. L. M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We reviewed the literature on standard case management (SCM), intensive case management (ICM), assertive community treatment (ACT), and critical time intervention (CTI) for homeless adults. We searched databases for peer-reviewed English articles published from 1985 to 2011 and found 21 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies comparing case management to other services. We found little evidence for the effectiveness of ICM. SCM improved housing stability, reduced substance use, and removed employment barriers for substance users. ACT improved housing stability and was cost-effective for mentally ill and dually diagnosed persons. CTI showed promise for housing, psychopathology, and substance use and was cost-effective for mentally ill persons. More research is needed on how case management can most effectively support rapid-rehousing approaches to homelessness

AB - We reviewed the literature on standard case management (SCM), intensive case management (ICM), assertive community treatment (ACT), and critical time intervention (CTI) for homeless adults. We searched databases for peer-reviewed English articles published from 1985 to 2011 and found 21 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies comparing case management to other services. We found little evidence for the effectiveness of ICM. SCM improved housing stability, reduced substance use, and removed employment barriers for substance users. ACT improved housing stability and was cost-effective for mentally ill and dually diagnosed persons. CTI showed promise for housing, psychopathology, and substance use and was cost-effective for mentally ill persons. More research is needed on how case management can most effectively support rapid-rehousing approaches to homelessness

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23947309

VL - 103

SP - E13-E26

JO - American journal of public health

JF - American journal of public health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 2196405